Skip to content

News & Events

Stay informed about research breakthroughs, university announcements, and opportunities to engage with Nagoya University's dynamic global community.

Admissions

Study in Japan's fourth largest city, and home to some of its most well-known companies—all without the Tokyo prices and Kyoto crowds.

Academics

Pursue your interests through one of our English or Japanese language programs, selecting from a wide variety of specialized fields.

Campus life

Find out about our facilities, comprehensive support, extracurricular activities, and the safe and welcoming community that fosters lifelong connections and growth.

About

Meet our leadership and discover the inclusive values and academic heritage that drive Nagoya University's contributions to knowledge and society.

Inhibitory proteins: Molecular twists and turns

A variety of protein structural interactions act to control the activity of actin filaments

Fig. 1: Crystal structures of the CP/V-1 complex (top) and the CP/CARMIL complex (bottom). CP is shown in green, the CP α-tentacle in red, V-1 in blue, and CARMIL in orange.

Actin is a ubiquitous filament protein that plays an essential role in numerous biological processes, including muscle contraction, neural development and the division and movement of cells. It is regulated by actin capping protein (CP), which binds tightly the ends of actin filaments.

CP itself is inhibited by two proteins called V-1 and CARMIL, and until recently scientists were unsure of the exact molecular mechanisms responsible for this inhibition. Shuichi Takeda and colleagues at Nagoya University have now determined exactly how these three proteins interact, showing that V-1 and CARMIL inhibit CP by two distinct mechanisms1.

Takeda and his team used X-ray crystallography to examine molecules of CP bound to fragments of V-1 and CARMIL. In a previous study, they found that three particular amino acid residues, which constitute part of a structure called the ‘α-tentacle’, are essential for binding to the ends of actin molecules. In their latest analysis of the CP/V-1 complex (Fig. 1), they revealed that these α-tentacle residues also participate in V-1 binding.

V-1 inhibits CP function by a steric mechanism, meaning that it simply gets in the way of the binding sites. To illustrate this point, the researchers showed that when V-1 was overexpressed in cultured cells, it enhanced the elongation of actin filaments. This effect occurs because the V-1 prevents CP from binding to the filaments.

Unexpectedly, the analysis also revealed that the CP molecule actually consists of two domains, and that it undergoes conformational changes, with the two domains constantly twisting against each other.

On examining CARMIL, the researchers unveiled a very different inhibition mechanism to V-1. CARMIL binds to CP on the opposite end from the actin binding site, suggesting that it inhibits CP by an allosteric, or indirect, mechanism. CARMIL binds CP at a site that straddles the two domains, and inhibits CP by preventing the twisting movements that are essential for tight actin filament capping.

This is the first study to show that CP is not a rigid molecule but one that actually undergoes dynamic structural changes. CARMIL utilizes this intrinsic fluctuation of CP to suppress capping activity, and V-1 and CARMIL act together to regulate the assembly of actin filaments within the cell by fine-tuning CP activity.

"We are now interested in capturing the twisting motion of CP directly," says Takeda, "because we believe this intrinsic fluctuation is a key to understanding the actin filament capping process. We are therefore planning to investigate CP by a more dynamic method like nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy."

Affiliated Researchers

The Nagoya University affiliated researchers mentioned in this highlight are from the Advanced Systems Biology: Designing the Biological Function GCOE program

Reference

  1. Takeda, S. et al. Two distinct mechanisms for actin capping protein regulation — steric and allosteric inhibition. PLoS Biology 8: e1000416 (2010). | article

We use cookies
By clicking "Accept Cookies," you agree to the use of cookies to improve your user experience, optimize the site, produce statistics, and interact with social networks.
Our Site Policy